Tuesday, September 23, 2014

A "SUPREMELY" IMPORTANT DECISION


September 23, 2014 

The United States Supreme Court recently announced it has added gay marriage to the agenda for its September 29th private conference.  The purpose of the conference is to determine which cases will accepted for decision making by the Court.  The justices have placed cases from Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Utah, Virginia, and Indiana for consideration.  The review of five such cases would seem to indicate the broad interest of the Court in this issue.  It would also seem to indicate that the Supreme Court is not going to delay some form decision making in this matter.

SCOTUS has already made some rulings on the gay marriage issue.  In a 5-4 decision in June of 2013 the Court ruled that the federal government must recognize the validity of gay marriages in states that allow them.  The Court has also refused to overrule a California court’s decision striking down that state’s gay marriage ban. 

While both these rulings can be viewed as sympathetic to the gay marriage agenda, this announcement of consideration of these five state court cases would be the first indication of the Court’s willingness to address whether individual states have the right to outlaw gay marriage.  Thirty one states presently have such laws on the books, but they are being attacked and overturned systematically by federal judges. 

Should the Supreme Court decide that gay marriage is a constitutional right, it would automatically invalidate all state prohibitions and legalize it nationwide.  This, of course, has huge moral, cultural, and religious implications.  When the Court steps into the moral and religious arena, its influence cannot be overstated.  Two previous rulings serve to drive home just how important and influential these decisions can be.

On June 17, 1963 SCOTUS issued its decision rewriting how government and religion interrelated.  Citing an invented “wall of separation” between church and state, the judges outlawed prayer and Bible reading in public schools as it had been practiced for decades.  This initial decision has since resulted in ongoing court fights over any representation of Christianity in public life.  It empowered atheism and basically neutered the rights of Christians to practice their faith in a public setting.  Prayers before football games, mentions of God in valedictorian speeches, even teachers bringing a Bible into the classroom have been judged violations based on the Court’s precedent making decision.  We are now experiencing in this country a government operating on the basis of freedom from religion, rather than freedom of religion. The moral and spiritual consequences of this have been catastrophic.

On January 22, 1973 SCOTUS issued another ground breaking decision with huge moral and spiritual implications.  This time the Court found for women an invented “right to privacy” which legalized abortion.  Over 40,000,000 dead babies later, the legacy of that decision continues to haunt us.  It stripped away the “right to life” of the unborn, placing the continuance of that life in the hands of the mother.  While regulations put forward by various states have sought to mitigate this decision, the damage done morally and spiritually is really incalculable.  The State, whose responsibility is to guard and protect the life of the innocent, has instead granted the right to destroy that life.

The possibility of  SCOTUS once again stepping into the realm of the moral and spiritual, this time in the context of determining what marriage is, gives me cold shivers.  Two Justices have already performed gay marriages.  Justices Kagan and Ginsberg have made very public their participation in officiating in these ceremonies.  There is no question as to where their loyalties lie.

The genius of those who founded this country and wrote its originating documents centered in their deep concern that a balance of power would be found in government.  The legislative, executive, and judicial branches were designed to serve as a system of checks and balances.  It is a system that, in theory, works.  However, as we have seen the Constitution recently trampled upon, reviled, and ignored, the coopting of the judicial branch of our government is especially disheartening.  When it begins to rule, not on the basis of the Constitution, but rather on the basis of the winds of social change, we have lost one of the last protections extended to us to protect us from the totalitarianism of barbarians.

Occasionally we still hear the singing of “God Bless America.”  I’m not really sure how much longer this country’s leaders can shake their fist in His face and defy His will before that will cease to be the case.  As we look at the encroachment of a poverty that is both physical and spiritual, that cessation may be, sadly, already occurring.

Please pray that SCOTUS will not add another nail to the spiritual coffin of this country by legalizing relationships that demean the sanctity and purpose of marriage and fly in the face of clear Biblical teaching.  I don’t know how much farther we can go down this dark trail before it will become impossible to find our way back.