Wednesday, May 28, 2014

QUESTIONS (YOU MIGHT NOT BE ASKING) AND ANSWERS (YOU MIGHT NOT AGREE WITH)


May 28, 2014

 

Here are some questions I have been asked to discuss several times recently.  Here are the answers in written form:

 

Q:  CAN A CHRISTIAN BE A MEMBER OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

A:  Of course.  Many are.  I would rephrase the question:  Should a Christian be a Democrat?

 

Q:  CAN A CHRISTIAN BE A MEMBER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?

A:  Of course.  Many are.  I would rephrase the question:  Should a Christian be a Republican?

 

Q:  AM I DISENCHANTED WITH BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES?

A:  That is an understatement.  On a national level the Democratic Party has taken positions on moral issues such as abortion and gay marriage which I believe are anti-Biblical.  On a national level the Republican Party waffles about on these and other issues and is, in my opinion, useless.

 

The solutions to the problems that we face as a country are not going to be resolved politically. In a system like ours, politics is ultimately driven by votes not values.  That means, all too often, political matters are settled with compromises and deals.  Pragmatically, from a power and control point of view that may work just fine.  But from a Christian point of view, it stinks.  Compromise and deal making get budgets passed and highways built.  Compromise and deal making also get unborn babies killed and gambling legalized. We must not forget that our battle, as Paul reminds us, is not against “flesh and blood.” (Eph 6:12).  We are in a battle that is very much about values and belief systems.  You don’t win that battle politically.  You win it spiritually.  You can’t just change people’s votes, you must change their hearts.  Political parties’ values morph over time (look at the two major parties now and fifty years ago).  Biblical values are transcendent and unchanging.  The baptistery will change this country a lot more than the voting booth.

 

Q:  WHAT ABOUT AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS?

A:  To me, there is a Biblical principle which I believe is very apropos here but has been neglected or ignored in the discussion of this highly emotional issue.  The principle underlies Biblical teaching on a number of matters.  For example, I believe it is the basis upon which “thou shalt not steal” (Ex 20:15) and “thou shalt not commit adultery” (Ex 20:14) are both founded.  Expressed simply, it is the principle that each human being has the right to possess exclusively that which he/she would call his/her own – be that money, property, family, etc.  To take that which is another’s is morally wrong.  Thus, based on this principle, the Law condemns my taking another man’s watch or his wife  (Biblical teaching on marriage is deeply rooted in the fact that my mate is my mate – not someone else’s.  I have exclusive rights to her.  Another man is to leave well enough alone).  In fact, this is such an important matter that the tenth commandment (Ex 20:17) tells me not to even allow myself to covet that which is the possession of another.

I believe this principle to be very germane to a discussion of amnesty for those who have entered this country illegally.   Prov 15:25; 22:28; 23:10 all emphasize the importance of respecting property markers and not moving them to take advantage of the weak or powerless.  Those boundary markers represent the personal property of individuals and to tamper with them is stealing.  Collectively, nations have always had boundary markers.  Crossing those borders without permission has severe ramifications for the violator.  It must be so.  A clear delineation of property lines is critical to an ordered life.  If those lines can be crossed without consequence, then ownership of property becomes meaningless and only chaos can result.  

Illegal aliens are here illegally.  This recognizes, in contradistinction, that many foreigners have entered this country legally.  They have secured visas and whatever documentation necessary for them to remain here. The difference is very important.  There is a world of separation between an individual who enters a home in the middle of the night without the owner’s permission, and a guest presenting an invitation who is attending a party at the same address.  One is a trespasser and possible thief, the other a guest.

While I have very mixed feelings about how we should respond to the plight of illegal aliens in this country, I am convinced we should not, must not, forget they are here illegally.  We need to show mercy.  We must reflect agape to all.  At the same time, we also need to make it clear that one must not, cannot, seize or enter another’s property without securing the right to do so. It is illegal.  It is sin.  While our heart may well be touched by the plight of a thief or his family, he is, nevertheless, a thief.  If thievery goes unpunished, especially if it begins to appear to be rewarded, we open a door to a plethora of consequences, many of which we are already facing.

I have no idea as to the solution to this mess – and a mess it is.  But I do know that ignoring this Biblical principle concerning ownership of property has cost us dearly and will continue to cost us until it is enforced.  Closing our borders is not mean-spirited or bigoted, on multiple levels it is necessary to our survival.

 

Dan Rouse

No comments:

Post a Comment