What
happens when you create a totalitarian state with no moral compass? I believe we’re in the regrettable process of
finding out. The nightmare that is our
federal government continues to bulldoze its way through or over the
Constitution as well as state’s and individual rights. If you love liberty, you know this cannot end
well.
A
friend of mine just made me aware of one of the latest bizarre, egregious,
overreaches for which our federal government is becoming increasingly infamous. This doesn’t pertain to shoving LGBT “rights”
down our throats or throwing open our borders to whomever wishes to come across
or seeking to punish the owners of the Washington Redskins for refusing to
change the team’s name, this, believe it or not, pertains to the problem of “regional haze.”
The Environmental
Protection Agency brought suit a couple of years ago against utility companies
in Oklahoma that produce electricity by burning coal. This federal agency, which, like the IRS, Homeland
Security, and others is absolutely running amok, demanded that the utility
companies follow a government mandated plan to reduce “regional haze.” Understand, this demand has nothing to do with public health. Let me repeat, this demand has nothing to do with public health. This is not about the release of toxic
chemicals or carcinogens into the atmosphere.
This has to do with visibility at national parks and wildlife areas
being reduced because of haze. A haze
which, the EPA claims, may be exacerbated
by coal burning power plants.
I’ve
lived in northeastern Oklahoma for nearly nine years now. Believe me, haze in the atmosphere is a part
of life here, particularly in the heat of summer. It has everything to do with lots of greenery
and stifling humidity. You could eliminate
every coal burning plant in the state and the haze is not going away. If you’ve travelled to Tennessee and visited
the beautiful Smoky Mountains, the natural haze is a part of their beauty. As we travelled to the Smoky Mountain National
Park last Fall, we passed at least two coal burning plants that had been closed
down. Hundreds of jobs were lost, but I wonder if “regional haze” was reduced
at all. There certainly seemed to be
plenty of it when we were there.
Here’s
what’s really frustrating. The state of Oklahoma
already had a plan in place that would more than meet the requirements set by
the EPA. And it would do so at a considerable
reduction to the estimated one billion
dollars the federally mandated plan is going to cost to implement. When Oklahoma
Gas and Electric and the Attorney General of Oklahoma filed a joint appeal to
this order, arguing that steps were already in place to meet its mandates, the
tenth circuit court of appeals in July of last year ruled in favor of the EPA’s
right to impose its federally mandated plan on the state. In May of this year, the Supreme Court
refused to hear an appeal to that decision.
The
result? Because the EPA and federal courts
arbitrarily rejected the state’s plan, which among other remedies would have
used low-sulfur coal to reach emissions goals, again, at a much cheaper cost to
consumers, under the federally mandated plan utility bills will increase a
minimum of fifteen percent. Many
estimates see utility costs as much as doubling. Oklahoma residents will bear an increased financial
burden because a federal agency decided to throw its weight around. We, in Oklahoma, are, in a very real sense,
being taxed by a bunch of federal bureaucrats who arbitrarily decided it was
worth billions of dollars (Oklahoma is not the only state affected by these
regulations) to, maybe, reduce the “regional haze” in our national parks.
How
much longer can this nation afford this type of abuse? Those on limited incomes who live in Oklahoma
are going to be forced to pay higher electric bills for no good reason! Why
should a set of bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. have the right to force Grandma
to pay an additional twenty to fifty dollars a month, just because they can?
We are
seeing more and more of these power grabs by an out of control federal
government. States and individuals find
themselves without recourse. Millions of voters can have their say on a moral
issue such as gay marriage, and a single federal judge can dismiss those votes. A state can institute its own regulations
regarding emissions from electric generating stations, which produce a result
within federal guidelines, and have a federal agency reject that plan and
institute its own.
I have
read about totalitarian regimes – Stalinist Russia or Castro’s Cuba. I never imagined I would live in one. We are moving in that direction at a frightening
pace. If states and individuals in this country don’t fight relentlessly
against a federal government that greedily seeks to control every aspect of our
lives, from the amount of salt in our food to the moral values we hold dear,
the day is coming when this will no longer be the land of the free and the home
of the brave. Our lives will be dictated
by legislators, courts, and bureaucrats whose god is power and whose moral code
is rooted in a rebellion against the laws of God.
Check
your history books, friends. This will
not be a pleasant place to live.
No comments:
Post a Comment